Framework Documents

Framework Documents

Structured documents for executive review, technical evaluation, and research-oriented discussion.

The Simulation Fidelity Rating framework is supported by a growing set of documents designed for different stakeholders. These documents are intended to clarify structure, measurement, classification, and consequence in formats that can be reviewed and shared internally.

Definition Architecture Measurement Classification Consequences Impact Evaluation Determination Documents

Why These Documents Exist


Different stakeholders require different levels of detail. The document set exists to make the framework usable across executive, technical, scientific, and institutional environments.

Available Document Types


Document Type 1

Executive Summary

Audience: Executives, leadership teams, investors, program decision-makers

Purpose

Provides a concise overview of simulation validity, SFR structure, classification, and consequence for leadership-level review.

Contents
  • Framework overview
  • Why SFR matters
  • Classification logic
  • High-level consequence summary
Document Type 2

Technical / Engineering Brief

Audience: Engineers, technical directors, evaluators, vehicle development teams

Purpose

Provides structural and measurement-oriented detail on system architecture, center-of-mass alignment, independent degrees of freedom, synchronization, and evaluation logic.

Contents
  • Architecture requirements
  • Motion origin
  • CoM alignment
  • DOF independence
  • Yaw significance
  • Evaluation method
Document Type 3

Medical / Neuroscience Brief

Audience: Researchers, clinicians, rehabilitation specialists, sports science personnel

Purpose

Provides context on vestibular timing, sensory integration, reaction timing, neuroplasticity risk, and training validity across clinical and research settings.

Contents
  • Vestibular-first timing
  • Sensory coherence
  • Reaction timing implications
  • Adaptation and consequence
  • Rehabilitation relevance

Expanded Documents


Evaluation Protocol Summary
In preparation
Classification Reference Sheet
In preparation
Consequence Overview
In preparation
Framework Introduction
In preparation
Research-Oriented White Paper
Available by request
Standards Proposal / Institutional Brief
Available by request

How These Documents Are Used


The goal of the document set is not promotion. It is clarity.

Next Step


Document Availability


Some documents may be published directly, while others may be released in stages or provided in controlled formats depending on audience and use case.

Published files should only be presented when current, reviewed, and aligned with the framework.

Portable Framework Materials

The purpose of this page is to make the framework portable. Documents allow the standard to move into meetings, reviews, institutions, and technical discussions without relying on live explanation.

A standard becomes useful when it can be reviewed outside the room.

Applied Framework

See How the Framework Is Applied

View structured interpretations of common system types and architectural categories.

View Interpretations →
Application Layer

Request Evaluation

Apply the framework to a real system, environment, or use case through a structured review pathway.

For teams, facilities, researchers, and organizations seeking structured classification or review.

Request Evaluation