Public record of completed SFR classification evaluations.
This registry is the public record of simulation systems that have been evaluated and classified under the SFR framework through the Pilot Validation Program. Each entry identifies the evaluation by a system-anonymized ID, records the classification result and evidence tier, and links to the inter-evaluator agreement record for that evaluation. The registry currently awaits its first entries.
No evaluations have been completed through the Pilot Validation Program. The registry structure is defined and ready to receive entries. The first entry will follow the first completed dual-evaluator evaluation under the program. See Pilot Validation Program for how to submit a system.
When entries are added, this page will be updated with the evaluation records. Each entry is added only after both evaluators have completed independent records and the records have been compared. Disputed determinations are included in the registry with their status noted.
The following table lists all completed evaluations. Classification, evidence tier, and status are shown. System identifiers are anonymized — manufacturer names and model numbers are not included in the public record.
| Evaluation ID | System Type | Classification | Evidence Tier | Evaluation Date | Agreement | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No entries. Registry awaiting first completed evaluation from the Pilot Validation Program. | ||||||
Classification values: In-the-Loop · Surface-Level · Out-of-the-Loop · Withheld (Insufficient Data). Status values: Final (evaluators agreed) · Disputed (disagreement unresolved).
The registry is a public evidence record, not a product directory. It exists to demonstrate that the SFR evaluation methodology has been applied to real systems by independent evaluators, and to provide a citable reference for organizations that reference SFR-classified systems in procurement, research, or policy documents.
The registry does not include manufacturer names, model designations, or any information that would identify the specific system being evaluated. System identifiers are assigned by the program coordinator and known only to the program coordinator and the submitting organization. This anonymization protects submitting organizations from commercial consequences that might discourage participation in the evidence program.
Submitting organizations may choose to publicly identify themselves as having participated in the program. If they do, the program coordinator may confirm the association between the named organization and the relevant evaluation ID. This confirmation is at the discretion of the submitting organization — not the program coordinator.
The registry exists for one purpose: to demonstrate that the framework works in practice. Its value grows with every entry.
An empty registry is honest. It accurately reflects the framework's current state: the infrastructure exists, the methodology is defined, and no evaluations have yet been completed. The alternative — populating a registry with fabricated or unverifiable entries — would undermine the entire purpose of an evidence program. The registry begins empty and fills as evaluations are completed.