Public log of all community review feedback submissions.
The feedback registry is the public record of every submission received during Stage 1 Community Review. Each item is logged with a Feedback ID, date, category, status, and final disposition. The registry is the evidentiary record that a community review process occurred. It currently awaits its first entries.
Stage 1 Community Review is open. No feedback has been submitted. The registry will be updated as submissions are received, acknowledged, and processed. To submit feedback, see Submit Feedback.
| Feedback ID | Date | Organization Type | Category | Summary | Status | Disposition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No feedback received. Registry awaiting first submission. | ||||||
| Status | Meaning | Next Action |
|---|---|---|
| Open | Submission received and acknowledged. Not yet reviewed. | Assignment to review category |
| Under Review | Substantive review in progress. Framework authors are assessing the submission against relevant normative documents. | Disposition decision |
| Accepted | Feedback accepted as submitted. Change has been or will be incorporated into the relevant normative document. | Changelog entry |
| Accepted w/ Modification | Feedback accepted but change incorporated in modified form. Disposition notes explain how the change differs from the submitted suggestion. | Changelog entry + disposition note |
| Declined | Feedback reviewed but no change made. Disposition notes explain the reasoning. Declined feedback is not dismissed — the reasoning is documented. | Disposition note published |
| Deferred | Feedback identifies a valid issue that will not be addressed in the current version. Queued for the next revision cycle. | Added to known issues log |
The feedback registry is a public document. It is visible to anyone reviewing the framework and is cited in the framework's Stage 1 documentation as evidence that community review is occurring in a structured, transparent manner.
Submitter names and individual contacts are not published without explicit consent. Organization type is published by default. Full organization name is published with consent. Anonymous submissions are accepted but carry less evidentiary weight in the community review record — an anonymous submission demonstrates that feedback was received, but cannot demonstrate organizational engagement.
Disposition notes for Declined items are published in full. Declining a submission is not the same as dismissing it. The reasoning for declining is part of the evidence trail — it demonstrates that the submission was considered and that the decision not to change the framework was deliberate and documented.
The registry exists to make the review process legible to anyone who looks. Its emptiness is currently its most important feature — it accurately represents the current state of engagement.
A feedback registry that has received no submissions is evidence of two things: that the framework is public and the review process is open, and that no one has yet engaged with it in a structured way. Both are honest findings. The registry grows as engagement grows. Submit feedback to add the first entry.