Acknowledgment of organizations and individuals who provide substantive review.
This page acknowledges organizations and individuals who have provided substantive feedback during Stage 1 Community Review of the SFR framework. Acknowledgment records participation only. It does not imply endorsement of the framework, agreement with its conclusions, or any commercial or institutional relationship between the contributor and the framework authors.
Substantive feedback is defined as feedback that includes a Feedback Summary field of at minimum 50 words that clearly identifies a specific issue, gap, or observation related to the framework's normative documents. Feedback that is acknowledged and logged in the Feedback Registry is automatically considered substantive unless it falls below this threshold.
Acknowledgment is voluntary and subject to the consent level specified in the original submission. Contributors who selected anonymous consent are not listed. Contributors who selected organization-only consent are listed by organization type and sector, without naming the organization. Contributors who selected named consent are listed by organization name.
The purpose of this page is to demonstrate that real organizations and individuals engaged with the framework during community review — not to imply that they approved of it.
The following organizations and individuals have submitted substantive feedback during Stage 1 Community Review of SFR v0.9 Draft. The list is updated as submissions are received and processed.
| Organization / Role | Sector | Feedback Category | Feedback ID(s) | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No contributors recorded. Stage 1 Community Review is open. Submit feedback to appear here. | ||||
Contributors specify their consent level at the time of submission. The three options are:
Contributors who did not specify a consent level are treated as anonymous by default. A contributor may update their consent level at any time by contacting the framework authors through the contact page.
Individual names and contact information are never published without explicit individual consent, regardless of organization consent level.
The organizations and individuals acknowledged on this page chose to engage with the framework seriously enough to submit structured feedback. That engagement — whether supportive, critical, or corrective — is the substance of community review. A contributor who submits feedback identifying a flaw in the framework is doing the framework more service than a reader who finds no problems. Both types of feedback are acknowledged with equal standing on this page.