Evaluation Inputs

SFR Evaluation Inputs

Required and optional data inputs for SFR evaluations.

This document defines the data inputs required to conduct an SFR evaluation. It separates required inputs — without which classification cannot be made — from optional inputs that enhance analysis but are not necessary for a determination. Classification must remain achievable using required inputs alone.

Evaluation Protocol Reference Test Methodology Evaluation Inputs Evaluation Process

Input Classification


SFR evaluation inputs are divided into two categories: required and optional. This distinction is structural, not aspirational.

A required input is one without which a criterion assessment cannot be completed. If a required input is unavailable, the relevant criterion cannot be assessed and the classification for that criterion defaults to Insufficient Data, not Pass. Optional inputs may enhance the analysis and support borderline determinations, but their absence does not automatically prevent classification.

This document is used in conjunction with the Reference Test Methodology (which defines what events are tested) and the Evaluation Process (which defines how inputs are assessed against criteria).

An evaluation conducted without all required inputs is incomplete. An incomplete evaluation produces Insufficient Data, not a classification.

Required Inputs


Required — Classification Not Possible Without These
R1

Motion Telemetry

Measured output of the motion system at the cockpit reference point. Must include position, velocity, and acceleration data on all actuated axes during each reference event.

Criterion addressed: A (Causative Accuracy), B (Temporal Coherence). Motion telemetry is the primary evidence for whether motion is derived from live physics state and whether it arrives in the correct temporal relationship.
R2

Physics Telemetry

The vehicle physics model output at the moment of each reference event. Must include vehicle position, velocity, acceleration, yaw rate, pitch rate, and roll rate as computed by the physics engine, time-stamped at the physics computation cycle.

Criterion addressed: A (Causative Accuracy). Physics telemetry is the ground truth against which motion telemetry is compared. Without it, causative accuracy cannot be assessed.
R3

Actuator Telemetry

Command and response data for each motion actuator during reference events. Must include the command signal sent to each actuator and the measured response, enabling comparison between commanded and delivered motion.

Criterion addressed: A (Causative Accuracy), B (Temporal Coherence). Actuator telemetry reveals whether the system is delivering what is commanded and whether any actuator-level delay is present.
R4

Synchronization Measurements

Timing data showing the relationship between the physics event timestamp, the motion system response timestamp, and the visual system frame timestamp. Must be captured from a common timing reference.

Criterion addressed: B (Temporal Coherence). Synchronization measurements are the direct evidence for whether sensory channels arrive in the correct temporal relationship.
R5

Control System Measurements

Response data from steering, throttle, and brake systems during reference events. Captures the participant's control corrections during each reference event, timestamped relative to the physics event that prompted the correction.

Criterion addressed: C (Human Response Relevance). Control system measurements are the primary evidence for whether the participant's corrections are driven by physical sensation or by visual input alone.

Optional Inputs


Optional — Enhance Analysis; Not Required for Classification
O1

Eye Tracking

Captures gaze direction and fixation patterns during reference events. Most useful for Criterion C (Human Response Relevance): an evaluator who observes that the participant's gaze is fixed on a visual reference point at the moment of a limit-state event has additional evidence that the participant is not responding to physical sensation.

Primary value: Borderline Criterion C cases where control system data alone is insufficient to determine whether response was visually or physically driven.
O2

Biometric Measurements

Physiological response data during reference events, including heart rate variability, galvanic skin response, and muscle activity patterns. Provides additional evidence of physiological stress response to physics events.

Primary value: Criterion C support in borderline cases and longitudinal research. Not a substitute for control system measurements as primary Criterion C evidence.
O3

Electroencephalography (EEG)

Neural response data correlated with reference event timing. Captures cortical processing patterns associated with vestibular versus visual stimulus processing. Requires lab-validated instrumented testing to apply reliably.

Primary value: Research-grade Criterion C analysis. Suitable for establishing baseline characterization data, not routine classification evaluations.
O4

Reaction Timing

Precise measurement of the interval between physics event onset and participant control response initiation. Captures the reaction latency pattern across events and can distinguish between anticipatory visual responses and reactive physical sensation responses.

Primary value: Borderline Criterion C cases where the control system data shows a response but the source (visual vs physical) is unclear from control system data alone.

Input Sufficiency Rules


The following rules govern how input availability affects classification outcomes.

Condition Effect on Classification
All required inputs present and valid Classification may proceed. Each criterion is assessed against its relevant inputs. Outcome may be Pass, Fail, or Insufficient Data per criterion.
One or more required inputs missing Criteria that depend on the missing input default to Insufficient Data. Classification of the overall system is Insufficient Data if any required criterion cannot be assessed. Classification proceeds on criteria for which required inputs are available.
Required inputs present but below quality threshold Treated as missing for classification purposes. Low-quality data is not substituted with optional inputs or lower-tier evidence to fill a required input gap.
Optional inputs absent No effect on classification availability. The evaluation proceeds on required inputs. A note may be made that optional inputs were not available, but this does not change the classification outcome.
Optional inputs present and contradicting required inputs Required inputs (Tier 1 evidence) take precedence. Optional inputs may prompt a notation of discrepancy in the evidence summary but cannot override a classification established from required inputs.

Optional inputs cannot replace required inputs. Absence of optional inputs does not trigger Insufficient Data.

Data Quality Standards


Required inputs must meet the following minimum quality standards to be considered valid for classification purposes. Data that does not meet these standards is treated as unavailable.

Specific minimum sample rates and calibration intervals will be defined in a supplementary technical specification document when the framework advances to v1.0.

Data Determines the Determination

The quality and completeness of evaluation inputs directly determines the quality of the classification outcome. A system that restricts evaluator access to required inputs cannot be fully classified. A system that is fully classified on required inputs alone has produced a valid, complete determination.

Optional inputs exist to strengthen and clarify borderline determinations, not to replace the required inputs that form the foundation of the classification framework. The five required inputs represent the minimum data set for a repeatable, credible SFR evaluation.

Classification is only as reliable as the data it is based on. Required inputs define that reliability floor.