Citation Guidelines

SFR Citation Guidelines

How to cite the SFR framework formally.

This document defines how to cite SFR v0.9 Draft in different document types: research papers, procurement documents, technical reports, and policy documents. It defines reference formatting, document-level citations, and version references. The framework's current status as a proposed standard should be accurately represented in any citation.

How to Cite the SFR Framework


The Simulation Fidelity Rating framework is a proposed standard at version 0.9 Draft (June 2026). It is not a peer-reviewed publication and has not been ratified by a named governance authority. Citations should accurately represent this status. The URL of the framework website should be included as the primary reference location until a formal publication record is established.

Every citation of SFR should include three identifying elements: the framework name, the version designation, and the revision date. Omitting the version designation creates ambiguity, since the framework is in active development and subsequent versions may differ from the version being cited.

Always cite the specific version: "SFR v0.9 Draft, June 2026" — not "the SFR framework" without version qualification.

Research Papers


Document Type — Research Paper (References Section)

General Framework Citation

Simulation Fidelity Rating Framework (SFR). (2026). Simulation Fidelity Rating: A Proposed Standard for Evaluating Simulation Systems. Version 0.9 Draft. [Proposed Standard]. Retrieved from https://understanding-simulation.replit.app/governance-framework.html

Use this citation when referencing the framework as a whole or when citing the governance structure.

Document Type — Research Paper (Inline / Methods)

Inline Citation — Classification Reference

The simulation system was classified using the Simulation Fidelity Rating framework (SFR v0.9 Draft, June 2026) against three criteria: Causative Accuracy, Temporal Coherence, and Human Response Relevance.

Use this format when describing classification in a methods section. The parenthetical should match the entry in the references section.

Document Type — Research Paper (Canonical Definitions Reference)

Citing a Specific Definition

As defined in the SFR Canonical Definitions document (SFR v0.9 Draft, June 2026), "In-the-Loop" refers to a simulation system that meets all six structural requirements of the In-the-Loop Standard, including causative accuracy, center-of-mass reference, and temporal coherence across all sensory channels.

When citing a specific term definition, reference the Canonical Definitions document specifically, not just the general framework.

Procurement Documents


Document Type — RFP / Procurement Specification

Classification Requirement Language

This procurement requires that the simulation system demonstrate compliance with the structural criteria of the Simulation Fidelity Rating framework (SFR v0.9 Draft, June 2026) at the In-the-Loop classification level. Specifically, the system must demonstrate: (A) Causative Accuracy — motion derived from live physics state; (B) Temporal Coherence — synchronization across all sensory channels; and (C) Human Response Relevance — physical cues sufficient to drive correct control response. Compliance shall be demonstrated through evaluated telemetry in accordance with the SFR Reference Test Methodology and Evaluation Process documents.

This language references the framework neutrally without endorsing any specific system. The SFR classification provides the evaluation criterion; the RFP process provides the mechanism for demonstrating it.

Document Type — Vendor Evaluation Rubric

Evaluation Criterion Reference

Evaluation criterion: SFR classification level achieved, assessed in accordance with SFR v0.9 Draft (June 2026), Evaluation Process document. Classification must be supported by Tier 1 (measured telemetry) or Tier 2 (architecture documentation) evidence as defined in the SFR evidence hierarchy. Tier 4 (manufacturer claims) evidence is not accepted as sole basis for classification.

Technical Reports


Document Type — Technical Report (Evaluation Report)

Evaluation Report Header Reference

Evaluation Framework: Simulation Fidelity Rating (SFR) v0.9 Draft Publication Date of Framework Version: June 2026 Framework Status: Proposed Standard (not yet ratified) Framework Reference URL: https://understanding-simulation.replit.app/governance-framework.html Evaluation methodology applied: Reference Test Methodology, Evaluation Inputs, Evaluation Process (all SFR v0.9 Draft)

Technical evaluation reports should identify the framework version in the report header so that readers can locate the specific version of the criteria that were applied.

Policy Documents


Document Type — Policy or Standards Reference

Policy Reference Language

Reference: Simulation Fidelity Rating Framework (SFR), Version 0.9 Draft, June 2026. Status at time of policy adoption: Proposed Standard (pre-ratification). Note: This policy references SFR v0.9 Draft as a structural evaluation framework. Organizations adopting this policy should note that SFR is under active development. When SFR advances to a ratified version, this policy should be reviewed for compatibility with the ratified version's criteria and definitions.

Policy documents that reference a proposed standard should include a review trigger that prompts re-evaluation when the standard advances to ratification.

Document-Specific References


When citing a specific document within the SFR framework, identify the document by name, classification, version, and URL.

Document Classification Citation Identifier
Governance Framework Normative SFR Governance Framework, v0.9 Draft, June 2026
Canonical Definitions Normative SFR Canonical Definitions, v0.9 Draft, June 2026
In-the-Loop Standard Normative SFR In-the-Loop Standard, v0.9 Draft, June 2026
Reference Test Methodology Normative SFR Reference Test Methodology, v0.9 Draft, June 2026
Evaluation Inputs Normative SFR Evaluation Inputs, v0.9 Draft, June 2026
Evaluation Process Normative SFR Evaluation Process, v0.9 Draft, June 2026
System Classification Normative SFR System Classification, v0.9 Draft, June 2026
Medical Risk Framework Informative SFR Medical Risk Framework, v0.9 Draft, June 2026
Neurological Reserve Informative SFR Neurological Reserve and Compensation Demand, v0.9 Draft, June 2026

Version References


When the SFR framework advances to later versions, citations should remain specific to the version that was actually used. Do not retroactively update citations to refer to a later version unless the later version's criteria were actually applied in the work being cited.

Version Reference Format When to Use
SFR v0.9 Draft Citing work conducted against the June 2026 draft. The current version at time of publication.
SFR v1.0 Proposed Standard For use when v1.0 is published. Do not use until the version is formally released.
SFR v1.0 Ratified Standard For use only after formal ratification. Will require a named governance authority.
SFR (version unspecified) Not recommended. Always specify the version to ensure reproducibility and interpretability.

Version specificity in citations is not a formality. A framework in active development may change between versions. A citation that specifies the version is reproducible; one that does not is ambiguous.

Cite Accurately, Cite Specifically

The SFR framework is available for reference and citation at its current proposed standard status. Organizations that cite SFR in procurement documents, research, or policy today are working with a framework in active development. Accurate citation practice — identifying the version, acknowledging the proposed standard status, and including a review trigger where appropriate — ensures that the work remains interpretable and updatable as the framework advances.

A citation that accurately represents what it is citing is more valuable to future readers than one that overstates or understates the authority of the source.